Pandangan Kritis Amin Al-Khuli Terhadap Tradisi Balaghah Klasik

Authors

  • Shadiqul Wahdi Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta Author
  • Raswan Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta Author
  • Ahmad Dardiri Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63822/xeqb9b38

Keywords:

Classical balaghah, Amin al-Khuli, Fann al-Qawl, reform, rhetoric, communication

Abstract

This paper explores Amin al-Khuli’s critical perspective on classical Arabic rhetoric (balaghah), which he viewed as rigid, formalistic, and outdated in addressing modern communicative needs. In his seminal work Fann al-Qawl, al-Khuli redefined balaghah as the art of effective speech that emphasizes context, purpose, and rhetorical impact, rather than merely aesthetic structure. He advocated for integrating logical and aesthetic elements and expanded the function of declarative sentences to include expressive and emotional dimensions. Rejecting the traditional divisions of balaghah, al-Khuli proposed a more functional pedagogical structure covering words, sentences, paragraphs, and texts. His approach positions balaghah within a dynamic, humanistic framework, closely tied to lived experience and socio-cultural development. This study affirms that al-Khuli’s ideas offer a foundation for revitalizing balaghah as a relevant and applicable discipline in modern Arabic language education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-khuli, Amin. 1996. Fann al-Qawl Amīn al-Khūlī. قاهرة: دار الكتب المصرية.

Fatikasari, Lina. 2023. “Al-jurjani dan sejarah perkembangan ilmu balaghah.” Maliki Interdisciplinary Journal 1 (4): 271–77.

Kholisin, Irhamni. 2020. “JEJAK ILMU BAYAN DALAM BUKU TEKS PERGURUAN TINGGI: PEMETAAN EKSISTENSI ILMU BAYAN.” In Konferensi Nasional Bahasa Arab VI (KONASBARA) 2020, 777–94. Malang: Malang, Universitas Negeri.

Muttaqin, Mohammad Izdiyan. n.d. “Tajdid Amin Al-Khuli fii Ta’lim Al-Balaghah wa’Alaqatuhu bi al-Uslubiyyah wa Al-Falsafah At-Tarbawiyah Al-Insaniyah.”

Nastiar, Muhammad Addien. 2023. “Unsur Balaghah dalam Surah al-Qari’ah (Telaah Kitab Safwah al-Tafassir).” Jurnal Ilmu Agama: Mengkaji Doktrin, Pemikiran, dan Fenomena Agama 24 (1): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.19109/jia.v24i1.16320.

Nuzula, Ulfa Nur Simaa, dan Farikh Marzuki Ammar. 2023. “Analisis Pembelajaran Ilmu Balaghah di Madrasah Aliyah Muhammadiyah 08 Takerharjo Solokuro Lamongan.” Emergent Journal of Educational Discoveries and Lifelong Learning (EJEDL) 3 (2). https://doi.org/10.47134/emergent.v3i2.19.

Umbar, Kisno, dan Ubay Abdillah. 2019. “تجديد دراسة البلاغة.” Prosiding Konferensi Nasional Bahasa Arab dan Pembelajarannya di Era Milenial, 24–35.

Zaenuddin, Mamat, dan Yayan Nurbayan. 2007. Pengantar ilmu balaghah. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Published

2025-07-17

How to Cite

Shadiqul Wahdi, Raswan, & Ahmad Dardiri. (2025). Pandangan Kritis Amin Al-Khuli Terhadap Tradisi Balaghah Klasik. Journal of Literature Review, 1(2), 401-409. https://doi.org/10.63822/xeqb9b38