Ketika Insentif Memicu Persaingan: Faultline, Machiavellianism, dan Masa Depan Riset Kreativitas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63822/evz6j416Keywords:
Kreativitas; Inovasi; Insentif Moneter; Insentif non-moneter; Faultline; MachiavellianismAbstract
Kreativitas dan inovasi sering disamakan, padahal keduanya berbeda secara konseptual dan operasional. Artikel ini menyajikan tinjauan literatur yang memetakan perbedaan kreativitas dan inovasi, serta mengulas bagaimana insentif moneter dan non-moneter memengaruhi perilaku kreatif karyawan. Menyoroti temuan bahwa kedua jenis insentif dapat saling menggantikan, namun juga berpotensi memicu persaingan antar-karyawan. Untuk memperkaya agenda riset ke depan, riset ini mengintegrasikan konsep faultline-garis pemisah sub-kelompok berdasarkan kesamaan atribut-dan Machiavellianism sebagai sifat manipulatif dalam Dark Triad. Tinjauan ini menunjukkan bahwa faultline dapat memperkuat konflik dan mengurangi berbagi pengetahuan, sementara insentif tim lebih efektif dalam bandingannya dengan insentif individu dalam konteks faultline tinggi. Di sisi lain, Machiavellianism cenderung berhubungan negatif dengan perilaku inovatif, meskipun dalam situasi tertentu dapat mendorong kreativitas yang berorientasi pada keuntungan pribadi. Artikel ini menutup dengan mengidentifikasi celah penelitian, khususnya interaksi antara jenis insentif, dinamika faultline, dan sifat Machiavellianism dalam menjelaskan kreativitas dan inovasi, serta menawarkan arah riset empiris selanjutnya di bidang akuntansi keperilakuan dan manajemen sumber daya manusia.
Downloads
References
Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20-39. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4278999
Burroughs, J. E., Dahl, D. W., Moreau, C. P., Chattopadhyay, A., & Gorn, G. J. (2011). Facilitating and rewarding creativity during new product development. Journal of Marketing, 75(4), 53-67.
Byrne, D. (1961). Interpersonal attraction and attitude similarity. The journal of abnormal and social psychology, 62(3), 713.
Camella, T. (1966). What Makes Creative People Different? Management Review, 55(7), 46.
Chen, Z. X., & Aryee, S. (2007). Delegation and employee work outcomes: An examination of the cultural context of mediating processes in China. The Academy of Management Journal, 226-238.
Christ, M. H. (2013). An experimental investigation of the interactions among intentions, reciprocity, and control. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 25(1), 169-197.
Collins, T. (2017). Innovation and imitation: substitutes or complements? Applied Economics Letters, 24(12), 863-867.
Hartmann, F., & Schreck, P. (2018). Rankings, performance, and sabotage: The moderating effects of target setting. European Accounting Review, 27(2), 363-382.
[Record #467 is using a reference type undefined in this output style.]
Lau, D. C., & Murnighan, J. K. (2005). Interactions within groups and subgroups: The effects of demographic faultlines. Academy of Management Journal, 48(4), 645-659. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.17843943
Lourenço, S. M. (2016). Monetary incentives, feedback, and recognition—Complements or substitutes? Evidence from a field experiment in a retail services company. The Accounting Review, 91(1), 279-297. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51148
Lubart, T. I. (1990). Creativity and cross‐cultural variation. International Journal of Psychology, 25(1), 39-59.
Mehta, R., Dahl, D. W., & Zhu, R. (2017). Social-recognition versus financial incentives? Exploring the effects of creativity-contingent external rewards on creative performance. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(3), 536-553.
Miron, E., Erez, M., & Naveh, E. (2004). Do personal characteristics and cultural values that promote innovation, quality, and efficiency compete or complement each other? Journal of organizational behavior, 25(2), 175-199.
Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39(3), 607-634.
Schreier, M., Fuchs, C., & Dahl, D. W. (2012). The innovation effect of user design: Exploring consumers’ innovation perceptions of firms selling products designed by users. Journal of Marketing, 76(5), 18-32.
Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580-607.
Snead Jr, K. C., Magal, S. R., Christensen, L. F., & Ndede-Amadi, A. A. (2015). Attribution theory: a theoretical framework for understanding information systems success. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 28(3), 273-288.
Srivastava, M., & Gosain, A. (2020). Impact of service failure attributions on dissatisfaction: revisiting attribution theory. Journal of Management Research, 20(2), 99-112. https://managementresearch.co.in/download/impact-of-service-failure-attributions-on-dissatisfaction-revisiting-attribution-theory/
Tian, Y., Tuttle, B. M., & Xu, Y. (2016). Using incentives to overcome the negative effects of faultline conflict on individual effort. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 28(1), 67-81. https://doi.org/10.2308/bria-51147
Young, S. M., Du, F., Dworkis, K. K., & Olsen, K. J. (2016). It's all about all of us: The rise of narcissism and its implications for management control system research. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 28(1), 39-55.
Yuan, F., & Woodman, R. W. (2010). Innovative behavior in the workplace: The role of performance and image outcome expectations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(2), 323-342.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Angelia Pribadi (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
