Dampak Norma Sebaya pada Etika Bahasa: Systematic Literature Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63822/54abza76Keywords:
Peer Norms, language ethicsAbstract
Abstract. This review aims to analyze the influence of peer norms on language ethics by examining how social normative frameworks and peer-based dynamics shape ethical language use across diverse communicative contexts. The method employed is a systematic literature review of scholarly articles addressing the impact of peer norms on ethical language practices. The literature search was conducted systematically through query transformation, screening based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, citation tracking, and ethical and contextual validation. A total of 50 selected articles were analyzed using qualitative thematic synthesis, grouping findings into five main areas: the influence of peer norms on language ethics, mediating mechanisms in ethical decision-making, differences between formal and informal contexts, the role of social identity and group affiliation, and theoretical contributions and implications for digital communication ethics. The findings indicate that peer norms exert a moderate to strong influence on ethical language behavior, with digital environments amplifying normative pressure through anonymity and group dynamics. These results highlight the complex interaction of norms, identity, and context in shaping language ethics and underscore the need for interdisciplinary approaches
Downloads
References
Aleksandric, A., Singhal, M., Groggel, A., & Nilizadeh, S. (2022). Understanding the bystander effect on toxic twitter conversations. arXiv.org, abs/2211.10764 null, . https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2211.10764
Bocian, K., Gonidis, L., & Everett, J. A. C. (2024). Moral conformity in a digital world: Human and nonhuman agents as a source of social pressure for judgments of moral character. PLOS ONE, 19 null, . https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0298293
Charroin, L., Fortin, B., & Villeval, M. C. (2022). Peer effects, self-selection and dishonesty. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 200 null, 618-637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2022.06.024
D'Arcy, A., & Bender, E. M. (2022). Ethics in linguistics. Annual review of linguistics, 9 (1), 49-69. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-031120-015324
Dang, J., & Liu, L. (2020). When peer norms work? Coherent groups facilitate normative influences on cyber aggression.. Aggressive Behavior, 46 (6), 559-569. https://doi.org/10.1002/AB.21920
Fedorov, A. A., & Rakhmanov, A. (2024). Moral conformity under different forms of virtual pressure. Experimental Psychologynull, . https://doi.org/10.17759/exppsy.2024170108
Huddart, S., & Qu, H. (2024). Rotten apples and sterling examples: Norm-based moral reasoning and peer influences on honesty. Journal of Management Accounting Researchnull, . https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar-2022-011
Kytölä, S. (2012). Peer normativity and sanctioning of linguistic resources-in-use — on non-standard englishes in finnish football forums online. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137283566_11
Maidment, N. T., & Narang, V. (2022). Conforming with peers in honesty and cooperation. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 195 null, 75-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2021.12.026
Marton-Alper, I. Z., Sobeh, A., & Shamay-Tsoory, S. G. (2022). The effects of individual moral inclinations on group moral conformity. Current research in behavioral sciences, 3 null, 100078-100078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crbeha.2022.100078
Norwanto, N., & Risdianto, F. (2022). The norm establishment in whatsapp group conversations. Journal of Language and Literature, 22 (2), 504-516. https://doi.org/10.24071/joll.v22i2.4810
Pratama, A. K., Rahmayani, K., Isma, M. A., Ramadhan, F., & Raziq, A. H. (2025). The role of communication ethics in addressing social differences and relational challenges in the digital era. Opini., 2 (1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.70489/ppzw0q07
Rosario, K. D., Bavel, J. J. V., & West, T. V. (2025). What does my group consider moral?: How social influence shapes moral expressions. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/dwzq2_v2
Ruiz-Palomino, P., Bañón-Gomis, A., & Linuesa-Langreo, J. (2019). Impacts of peers’ unethical behavior on employees’ ethical intention: Moderated mediation by machiavellian orientation. Business Ethics: A European Review, 28 (2), 185-205. https://doi.org/10.1111/BEER.12210
Vida, K., Simon, J., & Lauscher, A. (2023). Values, ethics, morals? On the use of moral concepts in nlp research. arXiv.org, abs/2310.13915 null, . https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2310.13915
Westerman, J. W., Beekun, R. I., Stedham, Y., & Yamamura, J. H. (2007). Peers versus national culture: An analysis of antecedents to ethical decision-making. Journal of Business Ethics, 75 (3), 239-252. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10551-006-9250-Y
Zapata, J., Sulik, J., Wulffen, C. V., & Deroy, O. (2024). Bystanders’ collective responses set the norm against hate speech. Humanities & social sciences communications, 11 (1), . https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02761-8
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Partono Partono, Septi Susanti (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
