Benchmarking Pemuliaan Tanaman Modern melalui Systematic Literature Review dan Meta-analisis: Pengaruh Marker-Assisted Selection (MAS) dan Seleksi Genomik terhadap Percepatan Perakitan Varietas, Kemajuan Genetik, dan Akurasi Seleksi

Authors

  • Mukhlis Mukhlis Politeknik Pembangunan Pertanian Malang Author
  • Afreza Pujianto Politeknik Pembangunan Pertanian Malang Author
  • Arum Pratiwi Politeknik Pembangunan Pertanian Malang Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63822/d0c8h515

Keywords:

Marker-Assisted Selection, Genomic Selection, kultur jaringan, CRISPR-Cas, pemuliaan tanaman modern

Abstract

Penelitian ini membahas percepatan pemuliaan tanaman modern melalui penerapan tiga pendekatan bioteknologi utama, yaitu Marker-Assisted Selection (MAS)/ Genomic Selection (GS), kultur jaringan, dan teknologi CRISPR-Cas. Latar belakang penelitian ini adalah lambatnya siklus pemuliaan konvensional yang menyebabkan keterlambatan dalam menghasilkan varietas unggul tahan cekaman dan penyakit, padahal kebutuhan akan peningkatan produktivitas pertanian semakin mendesak. Melalui pendekatan Systematic Literature Review (SLR) berdasarkan pedoman PRISMA 2020, penelitian ini menganalisis berbagai studi empiris dari tahun 2016–2025 untuk mengevaluasi efektivitas ketiga teknologi tersebut. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa GS mampu mempercepat siklus seleksi dan meningkatkan genetic gain per satuan waktu, sedangkan MAS efektif untuk karakter yang dikendalikan gen mayor. Kultur jaringan terbukti mampu menghasilkan bibit yang seragam, bebas patogen, serta mempercepat perbanyakan tanaman, sementara doubled haploid memungkinkan pembentukan galur homozigot hanya dalam satu hingga dua musim tanam. Selain itu, CRISPR-Cas memberikan peluang besar dalam meningkatkan hasil dan mutu tanaman dengan risiko off-target yang rendah apabila dirancang secara tepat. Integrasi ketiga teknologi ini berpotensi menciptakan sistem pemuliaan tanaman yang lebih cepat, presisi, dan efisien sehingga dapat mendukung pengembangan varietas unggul secara berkelanjutan.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Azad, M. A. K., Khatun, Z., El Jaoual Eaton, T., Hossen, M. I., Haque, M. K., & Soren, E. B. (2020). Generation of virus free potato plantlets through meristem culture and their field evaluation. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 11(11), 1827–1846. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2020.1111131

Beyene, Y., Gowda, M., Olsen, M., Robbins, K. R., Pérez Rodríguez, P., Alvarado, G., Dreher, K., Gao, S. Y., Mugo, S., Prasanna, B. M., & Crossa, J. (2019). Empirical comparison of tropical maize hybrids selected through genomic and phenotypic selections. Frontiers in Plant Science, 10, 1502. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01502

Bugajim, C., Groves, K., Henderson, C. W. L., & Brown, P. (2024). Yield performance of virus free sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas) cultivars in the highlands of Papua New Guinea. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/01140671.2024.2314475

Juliana, P., Singh, R. P., Braun, H. J., Huerta Espino, J., Crespo Herrera, L., Govindan, V., Mondal, S., Poland, J., Shrestha, S., & others. (2020). Genomic selection for grain yield in the CIMMYT wheat breeding program—Status and perspectives. Frontiers in Plant Science, 11, 564183. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.564183

Lee, T. G., Tieman, D., & Klee, H. (2021). Field evaluation of CRISPR driven jointless pedicel fresh market tomatoes. Agronomy, 11(10), 1957. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11101957

Mamiya, K., Takaichi, M., Tsuda, S., Munemori, H., Kasai, A., Nakano, M., & Mii, M. (2020). Production of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) microtubers using plastic culture bags and their field planting. Plant Biotechnology, 37(3), 425–436. https://doi.org/10.5511/plantbiotechnology.20.0603a

Wang, C., Xie, W., & others. (2024). A higher yield hybrid rice is achieved by assimilating alternative splicing. Nature Communications, 15, 1164. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-44835-0

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Richardson, W. S., Wilson, M. C., Nishikawa, J., & Hayward, R. S. A. (1995). The well-built clinical question: A key to evidence-based decisions. ACP Journal Club, 123(3), A12–A13.

Eriksen, M. B., & Frandsen, T. F. (2018). The impact of PICO as a search strategy tool on literature search quality: A systematic review. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 106(4), 420–431. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2018.345

Hong, Q. N., Pluye, P., Fàbregues, S., Bartlett, G., Boardman, F., Cargo, M., Dagenais, P., Gagnon, M.-P., Griffiths, F., Nicolau, B., O’Cathain, A., Rousseau, M.-C., & Vedel, I. (2018). Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018: User guide. McGill University.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Lumivero. (2023). NVivo (version 14) [Computer software]. https://lumivero.com

Arruda, M. P., et al. (2016). Comparing genomic selection and marker-assisted selection for Fusarium head blight resistance in wheat. Molecular Breeding, 36, 84.

Beyene, Y., et al. (2015). Genetic gains in grain yield through genomic selection under drought stress in tropical maize. Crop Science, 55, 154–163.

Crossa, J., et al. (2017). Genomic selection in plant breeding: Methods, models, and perspectives. Trends in Plant Science, 22(11), 961–975.

Heffner, E. L., et al. (2011). Genomic selection accuracy using multifamily prediction models. The Plant Genome, 4(2), 65–75.

Watson, A., et al. (2018). Speed breeding is a powerful tool to accelerate crop research and breeding. Nature Plants, 4(1), 23–29.

Hickey, L. T., et al. (2019). Breeding crops to feed 10 billion. Nature Biotechnology, 37(7), 744–754. (ditambahkan untuk melengkapi “lihat juga” yang Anda sebut; detail ringkas tanpa DOI sesuai data yang tersedia)

Abdelwahab Elansary, D. W., et al. (2024). Efficacy of plant tissue culture techniques for eliminating plant viruses. Plants, 13(21), 2959.

Abhang, S., et al. (2025). Efficiency of RAPD, ISSR and SSR markers in assessing genetic fidelity of micropropagated pomegranate. Scientia Horticulturae.

Bisht, V., et al. (2024). Assessment of genetic homogeneity of in-vitro propagated apple rootstock MM 104. Plants.

Blinkov, A. O., et al. (2025). Speed breeding: Protocols, application and achievements. Plants.

Ibrahim, M. S. D., et al. (2024). Exploring indirect somatic embryogenesis and somaclonal variation in Coffea arabica. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research, 84(1), 15–29.

IKPRRESS. (2025). Advances in haploid and doubled haploid technology for accelerating breeding cycles. PCBMB.

Kang, C. M., et al. (2025). Managing plant viruses in tissue-cultured apple and pear. Viruses.

Martínez, M. T., et al. (2024). Recent advances in plant somatic embryogenesis. Plants, 13(8), 1085.

Mousavimatin, S., et al. (2025). Indirect regeneration of long-term callus cultures in gladiolus. Frontiers in Horticulture.

Permadi, N., et al. (2025). Modern and traditional strategies for controlling microbial contamination in plant tissue culture. Current Research in Food Science.

Phong, T. H., et al. (2023). Somatic embryogenesis as a method for large-scale propagation. Scientia Horticulturae, 315, 112203.

Qu, Y., et al. (2024). Doubled haploid technology and synthetic apomixis. Molecular Plant, 17(9), 1521–1538.

Ren, J., et al. (2017). Novel technologies in doubled haploid line development. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 15(11), 1361–1370.

Sarropoulou, V., et al. (2024). Elimination of viroids via in vitro thermotherapy plus meristem tip culture in citrus/hop. Micro, 13(3), 37.

Thanuja, K. (2025). In vitro therapies for virus elimination in horticultural crops: A review. [Advance online publication].

Chen, F., et al. (2024). Recent advances of CRISPR-based genome editing for crop improvement. Frontiers in Plant Science.

Howells, R. M., et al. (2018). Efficient generation of stable, heritable gene edits in wheat using CRISPR/Cas9. BMC Plant Biology, 18, 215.

Li, J., et al. (2019). Whole-genome sequencing reveals rare off-target mutations in CRISPR/Cas9-edited crops with background variation. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 17(8), 1476–1478.

Wang, X., et al. (2021). Whole-genome sequencing reveals rare off-target in grapevine. Horticultural Research, 8, 37.

Gao, M., et al. (2024). Revisiting growth–defence trade-offs and breeding strategies. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 22(x), xx–xx. (detail volume/halaman tidak tersedia di sumber Anda)

Sahab, S., et al. (2024). Efficient multi-allelic genome editing via CRISPR–Cas9 in canola (DNA-free). Frontiers in Plant Science.

Ahmad, A., et al. (2024). Frontiers in global regulatory landscape of CRISPR-edited crops. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology.

Published

2026-06-27

How to Cite

Mukhlis, M., Pujianto, A. ., & Pratiwi, A. (2026). Benchmarking Pemuliaan Tanaman Modern melalui Systematic Literature Review dan Meta-analisis: Pengaruh Marker-Assisted Selection (MAS) dan Seleksi Genomik terhadap Percepatan Perakitan Varietas, Kemajuan Genetik, dan Akurasi Seleksi. Journal of Literature Review, 2(1), 628-639. https://doi.org/10.63822/d0c8h515