Epistemologi Kepemimpinan Transformasional: Telaah Komparatif antara Filosofi Pragmatisme dalam Pendidikan dan Model Servant Leadership
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63822/saq8eq56Keywords:
Transformational Leadership, Epistemology, Pragmatism, Servant Leadership, EducationAbstract
This article examines the epistemological foundations of transformational leadership through a comparison between pragmatic educational thought and the servant leadership model. Using a literature review approach, the article explores how both paradigms understand the sources of knowledge, the process of validating truth, and the moral implications for leadership practice. The study reveals that pragmatism places experience and reflection as the primary foundations for building knowledge. Truth is understood through practical benefits, problem-solving, and the ability to adapt to change. Servant leadership, on the other hand, emphasizes interpersonal relationships, morality, and service as epistemic resources that shape a leader's understanding of reality. Knowledge is born not only from empirical experience but also from sincerity, empathy, and a commitment to the well-being of others. The article's primary contribution is the formulation of the Pragmatic-Servant Epistemic Model (PSEM), an integration of experimental-reflective learning with a service-based epistemology. This model offers a new framework for educational leadership that demands both transformational capabilities and a strong moral orientation. This article is expected to enrich theoretical discussions and provide practical perspectives for educational leaders in facing the challenges of change and the need for humanization in learning environments.
References
Tjandra. S.N. (2014). Sintaksis Jepang. Jakarta: Bina Nusantara.
Alghamdi, A. K. (2024). Values-based leadership in post-pandemic educational settings: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Educational Administration, 62(1), 45–63.
Banks, G. C., Gooty, J., Ross, R. L., Williams, C. E., & Harrington, N. T. (2023). Servant leadership and organizational outcomes: An updated meta-analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 34(2), 101–124.
Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2019). Transformational leadership (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Bengtsson, M. (2016). How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. NursingPlus Open, 2, 8–14.
Berkovich, I., & Eyal, O. (2021). Transformational leadership in education and student outcomes: A systematic review. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(3), 400–417.
Biesta, G. (2019). The rediscovery of teaching. Routledge.
Booth, W. C., Colomb, G. G., & Williams, J. M. (2021). The craft of research (4th ed.). University of Chicago Press.
Burns, J. M. (2010). Leadership. Harper Perennial.
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. Macmillan.
Dinh, J. E., & Lord, R. G. (2022). Leadership as structural and relational knowledge systems. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 9, 147–175.
Eva, N., Robin, M., Sendjaya, S., van Dierendonck, D., & Liden, R. C. (2019). Servant leadership: A systematic review and call for future research. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(1), 111–132.
Goldman, A. H. (2020). Epistemology and cognition. Routledge.
Greenleaf, R. K. (1977). Servant leadership: A journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness. Paulist Press.
Hoch, J. E., Bommer, W. H., Dulebohn, J. H., & Wu, D. (2018). Do ethical, authentic, and servant leadership explain variance above and beyond transformational leadership? The Leadership Quarterly, 29(1), 1–16.
Meuser, J. D., Gardner, W. L., Dinh, J. E., Liden, R. C., & Hu, J. (2023). A meta-analysis of servant leadership and its outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 108(2), 281–304.
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Newman, A., Schwarz, G., Cooper, B., & Sendjaya, S. (2020). How servant leadership influences organizational trust and employee moral identity. Journal of Business Ethics, 161(3), 569–582.
Nguyen, T. D., & Burns, G. (2023). Epistemic adaptability in educational leadership: A framework for 21st-century learning environments. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 55(12), 1450–1465.
Northouse, P. G. (2021). Leadership: Theory and practice (9th ed.). Sage.
Sendjaya, S. (2019). Servant leadership research and practice. Springer.
Shields, C. M. (2020). Transformative leadership in education: Equitable and socially just change in an uncertain and complex world (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339.
Thomas, S., & Li, M. (2025). Hybrid ethical-pragmatic leadership models in contemporary education: A systematic review. International Journal of Educational Management, 39(1), 22–41.
Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2020). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for nursing research. Nursing Research, 69(1), 3–12.
Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Information Science, 45(1), 1–21.
Ye, L. (2021). Pragmatic leadership in higher education: Reflective action and experiential inquiry. Journal of Educational Leadership, 28(4), 410–428.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Herri Korneles, Rexy Andalangi Maatuil, Rojer Efrat Mentaruk (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
