Kontroversi Praktik Tahlilan di Masyarakat : Analisis Perspektif Hukum Islam dan Hukum Adat

Authors

  • Naqsa Fazrul Rahman UIN Palangka Raya Author
  • Hijrah Maulana Ibrahim UIN Palangka Raya Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63822/gz49ke20

Keywords:

Tahlilan, Islamic Law, Customary Law, ‘Urf, Cultural Acculturation, Islamic Moderation

Abstract

The practice of tahlilan is a religious tradition deeply rooted in the lives of Indonesian Muslim communities as a result of the acculturation between local culture and Islamic teachings. This tradition not only possesses a spiritual dimension in the form of prayers and remembrance for the deceased but also embodies social values such as solidarity, mutual cooperation, and strengthening social relationships within the community. However, the existence of tahlilan has sparked controversy, particularly from the perspectives of Islamic Law and Customary Law. This study aims to analyze the practice of tahlilan from both perspectives and to identify solutions to the dynamics developing within society. The research employs a qualitative method with a sociological approach and descriptive-analytical techniques. The findings indicate that, from the perspective of Islamic Law, tahlilan is viewed differently among Islamic scholars. Some consider it part of ‘urf shahih and bid’ah hasanah because it contains elements of prayer, remembrance, and charity, while others reject it due to the absence of direct precedent from the practices of the Prophet Muhammad SAW and his companions. Meanwhile, from the perspective of Customary Law, tahlilan is regarded as a tradition with significant social functions in maintaining harmony and solidarity within society. The proposed solution is a moderation (wasathiyah) approach that balances cultural preservation with the purity of Islamic teachings while avoiding practices that contradict Islamic law. Therefore, tahlilan can be understood as a flexible socio-religious tradition that remains relevant as long as it does not contain elements of polytheism or impose burdens on the community.

References

Al Munawar, Said Agil Husin. Fikih Hubungan Antar Agama. Jakarta: Ciputat Press, 2005.

Al-Qaradawi, Yusuf. Fiqh al-Awlawiyat. Kairo: Maktabah Wahbah, 1995.

Az-Zuhaili, Wahbah. Al-Fiqh al-Islami wa Adillatuhu. Damaskus: Dar al-Fikr, 2011.

Azra, Azyumardi. Islam Nusantara: Jaringan Global dan Lokal. Jakarta: Mizan, 2013.

Bin Baz, Abdul Aziz. Majmu’ Fatawa. Riyadh: Dar al-Qasim, 2000.

Dahlan, Abdul Aziz, dkk. (Eds.). Ensiklopedia Hukum Islam. Jakarta: Ichtiar Baru van Hoeve, 1996.

Maarif, Ahmad Syafii. Islam dalam Bingkai Keindonesiaan dan Kemanusiaan. Bandung: Mizan, 2009.

Misrawi, Zuhairi. Al-Qur’an Kitab Toleransi. Jakarta: Grasindo, 2010.

Moleong, Lexy J. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2012.

Muhammad, Bushar. Hukum Adat Indonesia. Jakarta: Tintamas, 1982.

Muhammad, Bushar. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Adat Indonesia. Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2003.

Salim dan Syahrum. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Citapustaka Media, 2012.

Siradj, Muhammad Said Aqil. Tasawuf sebagai Kritik Sosial. Bandung: Mizan, 2006.

Soekanto, Soerjono. Hukum Adat Indonesia. Jakarta: Rajawali Press, 2005.

Supiana. Metodologi Studi Islam. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2012.

Wahidi, Ridhoul. “Pola-Pola Penggunaan Kata Isim Dan Fi’Il Dalam Al-Qur’an.” ARABIYAT: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab Dan Kebahasaaraban 1, no. 2 (2014).

Published

2026-05-28

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Rahman, N. F., & Ibrahim, H. M. . (2026). Kontroversi Praktik Tahlilan di Masyarakat : Analisis Perspektif Hukum Islam dan Hukum Adat. Sujud: Jurnal Agama, Sosial Dan Budaya, 2(2), 1389-1398. https://doi.org/10.63822/gz49ke20